Build, buy or use what's in your ERP: finance AI
When it comes up
When a finance team wants an AI capability (close, AP, forecasting, reporting) and the options are a specialist vendor, the AI features of your ERP or productivity suite, or something built on a model platform by IT.
Your options
Use the AI already in your ERP / suite
Fits when: The use case is standard (coding, matching, drafting) and your core platforms already offer it under existing contracts and controls.
Watch out: Features may lag specialists; pricing often moves to add-on seats or credits; you depend on the vendor's roadmap.
Buy a specialist finance AI vendor
Fits when: The process is complex and specialist tools are proven in it (AP, reconciliations, cash forecasting), and you need results fast.
Watch out: Integration cost, data leaving your platforms, vendor viability, lock-in, and overlap with features your ERP will ship next year.
Build on a model platform
Fits when: The use case is differentiating or unusual, you have data and engineering capacity, and you need control over data, models and logs.
Watch out: Run and maintenance costs, talent dependency, model change management and owning the controls end to end.
How to decide
- Is it differentiating? Standard finance processes rarely justify building.
- What do you already own? Check the AI features in your ERP and productivity licences before buying anything new.
- Compare total cost over 3 years in the ROI builder: one-off, licences or tokens, people, integration and exit.
- Test controls and evidence: can the option produce the audit trail your auditor needs?
- Check the data path: where does finance data go, and under which contract terms?
- Decide per use case, and revisit at each renewal: today's build may be tomorrow's commodity feature.
Trade-offs
Suite AI is cheapest to adopt but least differentiated; specialists deliver faster in complex processes but add integration and vendor risk; building gives control and fit at the cost of run effort, talent and owning every control.
Real examples
- JPMorgan Chase built its own generative AI assistant, LLM Suite, and was rolling it out to 140,000 employees in 2024; President Daniel Pinto estimated the value of the bank's AI use cases at close to $2 billion, much of it related to fraud prevention. Source: Banking Dive — JPMorgan Chase rolls out LLM Suite generative AI tool to 140,000 employees (Sep 12, 2024) ↗
- Microsoft launched Copilot for Finance in public preview on February 29, 2024, offering reconciliation, collections and variance-analysis scenarios inside Excel, Outlook and Teams, connected to systems such as Dynamics 365 and SAP: the 'use what's in your suite' option. Source: Microsoft — Introducing Microsoft Copilot for Finance (Feb 29, 2024) ↗
What to check first
- Which AI features your ERP, close and productivity licences already include, and at what extra price.
- Whether the use case is standard or genuinely differentiating for your company.
- Three-year total cost of each option, including run costs and exit.
- Whether each option can produce the audit trail and logs your auditor will require.
Learn and use
Sources
- Banking Dive — JPMorgan Chase rolls out LLM Suite generative AI tool to 140,000 employees (Sep 12, 2024) ↗
- Microsoft — Introducing Microsoft Copilot for Finance (Feb 29, 2024) ↗
Last reviewed 2026-10-01.